<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alleged Child Porn Victims Identified—As Adults. Prosecutor Ignores Evidence, Insists They Are Pre-Teens, And Proceeds With Prosecution.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:38:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: amjur</title>
		<link>http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>amjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>@Liza

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Liza</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liza</title>
		<link>http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Liza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I read your posts for   a long time and should tell   that your posts are always valuable to readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your posts for   a long time and should tell   that your posts are always valuable to readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reality of Child Porn &#171; CP Explosion</title>
		<link>http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reality of Child Porn &#171; CP Explosion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] Alleged Child Porn Victims Identified—As Adults. Prosecutor Ignores Evidence, Insists They Are Pre... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alleged Child Porn Victims Identified—As Adults. Prosecutor Ignores Evidence, Insists They Are Pre&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amjur&#8217;s Commentary on prosecutorial misconduct at Sex Blog Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Amjur&#8217;s Commentary on prosecutorial misconduct at Sex Blog Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] (And ignoring the fact that the women were available as witnesses and had signed affidavits).Read Amjur&#8217;s account of prosecutorial misconduct here. If that link is too long for your browser (no jokes, please) TinyUrl [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (And ignoring the fact that the women were available as witnesses and had signed affidavits).Read Amjur&#8217;s account of prosecutorial misconduct here. If that link is too long for your browser (no jokes, please) TinyUrl [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amjur</title>
		<link>http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>amjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>There’s more than one. The Hoose case, the other cases Melissa Bertsch was involved in, cases involving Euro star Tove Jensen, and I read something about Kitty Jung images being charged as child porn http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1453449/ Most if not all these cases involved Tanner Staging or a medical professional proffered as an expert in age determinations.

What’s interesting is that there are other maturity scales, but the one they always use is Tanner’s. 

They will never outlaw Tanner Staging, at best it will be treated like Polygraph examinations, generally inadmissible in court. But until several doctors lose their license and are charged for perjury, they will keep using it under the radar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s more than one. The Hoose case, the other cases Melissa Bertsch was involved in, cases involving Euro star Tove Jensen, and I read something about Kitty Jung images being charged as child porn <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1453449/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1453449/</a> Most if not all these cases involved Tanner Staging or a medical professional proffered as an expert in age determinations.</p>
<p>What’s interesting is that there are other maturity scales, but the one they always use is Tanner’s. </p>
<p>They will never outlaw Tanner Staging, at best it will be treated like Polygraph examinations, generally inadmissible in court. But until several doctors lose their license and are charged for perjury, they will keep using it under the radar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fyifoff</title>
		<link>http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>fyifoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 17:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amjur.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/alleged-child-porn-victims-identified%e2%80%94as-adults-prosecutor-ignores-evidence-insists-they-are-pre-teens-and-proceeds-with-prosecution/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>fyifoff, on September 6th, 2007 at 7:49 pm Said: 
Do you think this one case, showing that the tanner scale didn’t work is enough weight for past and present cases that they shouldn’t (have) use the scale?

If they don’t use the tanner scale, how do you know the actually age of the person in the picture?

Do you think a law baning the use of the tanner scale would be supported?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fyifoff, on September 6th, 2007 at 7:49 pm Said:<br />
Do you think this one case, showing that the tanner scale didn’t work is enough weight for past and present cases that they shouldn’t (have) use the scale?</p>
<p>If they don’t use the tanner scale, how do you know the actually age of the person in the picture?</p>
<p>Do you think a law baning the use of the tanner scale would be supported?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
